tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2789017239427251571.post8136301327031452513..comments2024-03-12T00:16:08.021-06:00Comments on Wireless Noise: News, Rumors and Arguments: Fake News? Why Didn't We Think of That?Oz Andrewshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17298717393298238178noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2789017239427251571.post-61508866140182558272017-01-24T18:58:29.502-07:002017-01-24T18:58:29.502-07:00Fair enough. Thank you for replying. Fair enough. Thank you for replying. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2789017239427251571.post-7975655284907047532017-01-24T11:48:44.350-07:002017-01-24T11:48:44.350-07:00You are correct. The erroneous part of our report...You are correct. The erroneous part of our report are the words, "Sprint has announced..." The Re/Code article quoted "sources" without much qualification. Fortunately, our site includes "rumors" that, at the time of the article, were credible. The "downgrade" in our Reviews is not based just on the cell site rumor, but on the general cost-cutting and the lack of new full-power cell sites. But it isn't "Fake News".<br /><br />And rumors still fly: T-Mobile to buy Sprint...Sprint to buy T-Mobile...Dish to buy Sprint. Much will be known when the new administration takes their position on mergers & acquisions, and after the current spectrum auction concludes.<br /><br />We have removed the "cell site" rumors from some of our reviews, however, I see they still show on a few other pages. Yes, they should come off. We have had an internal disagreement whether we should review the top 4 carriers at all since anything we say adds little to what wireless users already know. Until there is agreement, nothing gets changed. I'll try to push this to the next step.Oz Andrewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17298717393298238178noreply@blogger.com